120+

Years of combined experience across cybersecurity, psychology, and communication

4

Disciplines under one roof: technology, behavior, governance, communication

Built from 18 months of working together in the field.

CyberSynergy360 started with four people who spent 18 months working side by side in the Belgian public sector. That shared history matters. We did not form a team by assembling profiles. We built trust by working through real problems together, under real pressure.

In that time, we saw the same problem repeat itself across organizations: security investments that could not be validated, compliance exercises that produced paperwork but did not improve resilience, and leadership left without a clear picture of what their investment was actually delivering.

The answer was rarely more technology. More often, it was a failure of governance, a gap in how people understood their role, or communication that did not reach the right people in a form they could act on.

We founded CyberSynergy360 to fix that. Most security firms send in technical consultants. Some add a governance layer. Very few address how people actually behave under pressure, and almost none have a plan for what to say when something goes wrong. We combine all four disciplines in one team: a practising psychologist, a crisis communication strategist, and two senior technical consultants who have worked through real incidents together. That combination is what CyberSynergy360 is built on.

The team most security firms cannot assemble

A practising psychologist. A crisis communication strategist. Two senior technical consultants. All four at the table on every engagement, with no junior staff in between.

Patrick Van Alboom

People & Behavior

Patrick Van Alboom

Patrick is a psychologist with an ISO 27001 certification and a straightforward view on why security programs succeed or fail. Most organizations treat behavioral security problems as a training gap. Patrick's assessment usually finds something different: a culture problem, a policy design problem, or a communication failure. He designs interventions that change what people actually do, not just what they say they know.

Psychology ISO 27001 Security Awareness
Natalie Braine

Communication Strategy

Natalie Braine

Natalie brings 25 years of experience in communication, content strategy, and stakeholder management. She is trilingual in Dutch, French, and English. Her background spans communication management, content marketing, and recent work in information security within the Flemish public sector. Within the team, she is the connector: between what the technical assessment finds and what management and end users need to understand. She leads crisis communication planning and helps organizations build the capability to manage an incident without losing control of the message.

NL · FR · EN 25+ Years Communications Crisis Communication
Tom De Cubber

Technology & GRC

Tom De Cubber

Tom brings 30 years in IT and more than a decade in cybersecurity, with deep expertise in ISO 27001, CyFun, and NIS2. As a CISSP-certified vCISO, he translates security frameworks into governance that works in practice, not just on paper. He bridges the gap between technical controls and board-level accountability, and keeps management honest about what their security program actually delivers.

CISSP Certified 30+ Years IT ISO 27001 NIS2 / CyFun
Vincent Alwicher

Technical Security

Vincent Alwicher

Vincent covers the technical security side of every engagement. With experience across enterprise-scale environments, he has a practical sense for where organizations are exposed and what it takes to close those gaps. He brings the depth to back up what the assessment says, and keeps the technical recommendations grounded in what is actually implementable.

Enterprise Security Risk Assessment

Five principles that shape how we work

Integrity

We say what we find, not what clients want to hear. Independent assurance is only worth something if it is genuinely independent.

🤝

Collaboration

Security is a shared responsibility. We work with your team, not around it. The goal is to leave you stronger, not dependent.

💡

Clarity

Complex security findings in plain language, prioritized by what matters most. Decision-makers should be able to read our reports and know what to do next.

🛡

Resilience

We are not here to produce a report that covers us. We are here to make your organization genuinely more secure and more capable of recovering when things go wrong.

Balance

Technology without people and process is fragile. People without the right tools and governance are exposed. We address all three together, because that is the only approach that holds.

Want to know if we are the right fit for your situation?

A 30-minute conversation is usually enough to find out. No commitment on either side.

Request a conversation